March 1, 2013
Mayan prophecy coming true in recent new testament revelation
Mayan Prophecies & New Testament
Truth can shatter your world, world meaning human civilization, history or the human experience. The truth can cause your world to come to an end; it has the ability to cut apart the fabric of lies interwoven within it. If you follow truth it can bring pain but at the end it can help to heal the wounds of deception and betrayal. The findings highlighted in the riveting eye opening documentary Caesar’s Messiah has the capability of bringing over 33% of humanities world to a crashing halt. Did the Mayan prophecies come true after all, could this information be the end of the world for some?
It is two and a half months since many people anxiously anticipated the end of the world. As we approached 2012 the media, internet and prophecy watchers fervently mulled over writings, videos and artifacts to understand what was to come. The countdown days of December 2012 promoted the minds of many to ponder the outcome of our world as we know it.
Some say the Mayans were not giving literal prophecies for the physical earth. If not literal then what was it? This “end time” warning was to represent a shift in consciousness, it was not meant to be the annihilation of all of humanity in one swift blow but a change in our Spiritual awakening. For the last 2500 years humanity at large has been in a lulled sleep state, December 21 marked the end of that age of darkness. The door to conscious elevation has opened we all have an opportunity to enter into the age of spiritual enlightenment. In this time we shall know the truth and it shall set us free.
This documentary helped to connect the dots that have stuck out to me over the years. My countless lingering questions and theories of foul play have been explained in a logical and systematic way and in layman’s terms for all to understand. I implore you, your family; your friends and anyone who desires to allow some light to be shed on a 2000 year old cold case mystery to view this film Caesar’s Messiah (The Roman conspiracy to invent Jesus). Just released in Fall of 2012 this film gives a whole new perspective on uncovering the true origins of Christianity.
Who really started it?
What was their motive?
Was it divinely inspired or humanly concocted?
Who is the historical son of God?
If you are a truth seeker you won’t regret, if you are a religious minded you might contest it but one thing is certain after viewing it you won’t forget it. If nothing else let’s talk about it and explore the possibilities of truth.
December 20, 2012 – Santa Barbara Independent
Was Jesus Invented?
Santa Barbara’s Joseph Atwill Leads the Jesus-as-Invented Theorists
(sidebar article to this Cover Story)
What if Jesus Christ never existed at all? The answer may surprise you if you take it from Santa Barbara author and filmmaker Joseph Atwill. He’s spent years developing the theory that the Christian messiah was created as a tool of political propaganda by Roman rulers to pacify the empire and undercut the more dangerous Jewish leaders of the era. With his findings detailed in a book and documentary, both called Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus, Atwill is frequently called on to discuss and debate his views all over the world, including recent bits on the BBC, and he believes his influence is growing.
“I didn’t have anything against Christianity,” said Atwill, who was raised Christian, fell away for no particular reason, and then became fascinated when the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered. “I thought this was something the population would want to know about, and I’m happy to explain it.”
When he dove into the Dead Sea Scrolls, Atwill was surprised to find the messianic movement of Jesus’s time described as militaristic rather than pacifist. “The whole thing made no sense to me,” said Atwill, who then discovered a lot of weird parallels between the gospels and the writing of Roman scribe Josephus, who detailed the Jewish-Roman wars, as well as the recurrent biblical themes from the Old Testament that are used to describe Jesus’s life, which he finds suspicious. He also sees the official designation of Christianity as the Roman religion by Constantine a convenient means of ushering in a new system of feudalism. “The religious context for slavery worked for over 1,000 years,” said Atwill. “That’s what happened — a complete nightmare. Merry Christmas.”
Seasonal well-wishing aside, Atwill’s ideas have sparked a wave of new websites and researchers, but he considers himself the origin of recent inquiries. “As far as I can tell, I was the first person to have this strange insight,” said Atwill, who describes himself as a hobbyist interested in literary analysis. “The reason I’m able to see this stuff is that I didn’t have any mistraining.”
“Caesar’s Messiah Doc” REVIEW
November 9, 2012 in Activism
Before you let out a big sigh and say, “Another person saying Jesus never existed.” You have heard theories, but you have not heard this theory yet.This documentary is explosive in its implications. Historians should watch it, as it may be the next front runner of theories that you will have to debate against. Non-Christians, Christians, liberty lovers – this one is definitely for you. You need to watch it a few times to really get all the details. But it only takes one viewing to get the gist of Joseph Atwill’s thesis: a Roman family, the Flavians, created Christianity for very specific political reasons – and they left a signature behind to prove it. Now my main question is if and when this research will be accepted by scholars as the best explanation of the Roman origin of Christianity. I had my doubts about this idea when I first heard it. It sounded to me like another person who is just over-anxious to put a conspiratorial spin on Christianity. But on viewing the documentary, it appears that the history really does bear the claim out. Of course, it should not be that great of a surprise that this would be true. Christianity had to develop somehow, and we can be fairly sure that it isn’t how the fundamentalists are telling us that it did. Joseph Atwill gives a sober, historical, and scholarly exposition on his thesis. It is impressive compared to other conspiracy theories in its sobriety and wealth of historical EVIDENCE and DOCUMENTS. Joseph has not channeled these ideas, and he is not asserting anyone to be of non-human stock. It is simply historical proof that the Roman imperial dynasty was very much like other imperial families in their lust for attaining power and Christianity was developed by them to serve those ends. This work is either GROUNDBREAKING or utter nonsense. I am majorly betting on the former. You should check it out and come up with your own conclusion.
Oct. 11, 2012 – Santa Barbara Independent
***** RECOMMENDED: Caesar’s Messiah (84 mins.; NR)
Though most historians tend to believe that Jesus of Nazareth truly did walk the earth at some point in the first century CE, this documentary – based on a book of the same name by biblical scholar Joseph Atwill – explores the fascinating theory that the messiah was created as a tool of political propaganda to control residents of the Roman empire and undercut the Jewish leaders of the era. Specifically, Atwill and a host of other revisionist pundits cite the Dead Sea Scrolls, other documents contemporary to that timeframe, and numerous known relationships and occurrences to posit that the Flavian line of Roman emperors created Christ and the subsequent religion of Christianity to battle a more strategically dangerous form of messianic Judaism. The film is very much one-sided in its investigation, but the theory and its presentation prove to be captivating, thought-provoking, and deserving of the attention of anyone who’s interested in history and how it came to be written. Could it possibly be true that the man behind so many of humankind’s highs and lows was invented to control the masses? It’s a suggestion worth considering, even – and perhaps more importantly – for the faithful among us.
— Matt Kettman
Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus
- Genre: Documentary
- Running Time: 84 min.
- Director: Fritz Heede
- Cast: Robert Eisenman, Timothy Freke, Acharya S, Joseph Atwil, Ken Humphreys
- Writers: Nijole Sparkis & Joseph Atwill
Jesus Christ did not exist. He was, instead, a fictional character created by Roman emperors seeking to cultivate religion as a tool more powerful than war. Such is the thesis set forth by historian Joseph Atwill in his 2005 bestseller and in this provocative documentary by director Fritz Heede. The Jesus backstory Atwill and other scholars relate on-screen is crazily complex, but the gist of it is that the Flavian family of Rome supervised the writing of the Gospels as part of a calculated effort to create a “peaceful messiah” whose message would calm the rebellious masses. To be honest, this reviewer isn’t deeply knowledgeable about Biblical history, so this names-and-dates-jammed film made me feel as if I’d walked into the wrong lecture hall in the middle of the semester–lost! Heede and Atwill presumably intend to inspire a dialogue with open-minded Christians, yet they begin with this voiceover proclamation: “No doubt Christians have done a lot of good for the world. But then, there are other Christians, often the most dogmatic [cue a photo of President George W. Bush], who create wars, hatred, and other harm under the disguise of religion.” That said, a calm, methodical history lesson ensues, but will any Christians stick around to hear it?
— Chuck Wilson
Caesar’s Messiah: Rome Invented Jesus, New Doc Claims
Those were trying times for Rome. Nero, the last of the Julio-Claudian Caesars and a big spender with a reputedly homicidal temper, was on the throne. Stories abound of how he attempted to poison his mother, kicked one of his wives to death, and personally ordered the upside-down crucifixion of St. Peter. Lies and half-truths, most of those tales, but stuff like that sticks. More important, Nero’s Roman Empire was going broke.
While Rome simmered, Palestine cooked. The Jews loathed the Romans. They didn’t want statues of Roman emperors in their temples, didn’t want to pay taxes to prop up the empire, and, most of all, didn’t want Caesar’s emissaries making claims on their promised land. And they were recklessly brave in battle. Hot rebellion was in the air.
Through all that, a loose cannon of a prophet was reportedly roaming through the Judean war zone, preaching pacifism and spouting profundities like, “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s.”
That’s the situation, more or less, that Joseph Atwill describes at the beginning of Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus, the new documentary movie based on Atwill’s book of the same name. (The film screens at Laemmle Music Hall 3 staring September 28 and is available for sale at Atwill’s website, caesarsmessiah.com.)
The wandering prophet was, of course, Jesus Christ. Atwill, a self-taught biblical scholar, contends that not only was there no historical figure of that name, but also the legends that accumulated around him were actually created by the Romans as a way of pacifying the Jews. The evidence is overwhelming, he says.
The Dead Sea Scrolls, ancient Jewish texts discovered in caves in Israel in 1947, give a different picture than the idyllic first century Holy Land of the Gospels. From year one, there were battles and confrontations between the Romans and the Jews, the Scrolls note, and there was no turning of the other cheek by the likes of rebel leader Judah of Galilee. And there was nary a mention in the Scrolls of the peaceable prophet Jesus Christ.
“This is where I came into Christian scholarship,” says Atwill, 63, who’s been studying the ancient texts in their original languages for decades. “There was supposedly this character, Jesus, wandering around in Galilee. Nobody knew anything about him. Galilee is only 30 miles long. Jesus and other historical figures of the time would have known each other.”
Atwill, an admittedly bookish man, dived in headfirst, digging out whatever historical records he could find, studying the Scrolls, and reading Roman accounts, notably that of a family member of the Flavian dynasty of Caesars named Josephus. He found no historical Jesus in any of those writings. But there were some uncanny connections between the story of Jesus as told in the Gospels and the family of Roman emperors who took power after Nero was forced to commit suicide following a coup d’état.
The movie spells out an intriguing scenario of creative deception by the Romans: Sometime in the mid 70s AD, Atwill suggests, Greco-Roman intellectuals wrote the now-well-known stories—in Greek, not the popular Aramaic of the Judaic populace—about the Jewish messiah who defied the Judaic traditions of militancy to preach a sweet, accommodationist message. The legends began to take hold in the decades that followed. The illiterate peasants of the time couldn’t read them, of course. But preachers preached it—preachers who were given the red-carpet treatment by Roman authorities.
What about all those Christians being fed to the lions in the colosseum? True enough, Atwill says. Only the victims weren’t followers of Jesus but militant Jews who, as believers in a messiah, or christos in Greek, qualified as “Christians” and earned the ire of the Caesars.
Atwill and other scholars maintain that the Romans were ingenious in pulling off the pacifist hoax, so useful to the ruthless men who administered the Roman empire. They were able to “create a type of Judaism that was benign,” says one commentator.
The Romans even got in a plug for the godlike qualities of the bloody Roman general and soon-to-be Caesar Flavius Titus. It wasTituswho led the Romans against the Jews in the war of 66 to 73, crushing the towns of Galilee, laying siege to Jerusalem, and ultimately razing the Jewish temple there. Encoded in the Gospels, Atwill contends, are multiple references to Titus, establishing a direct connection between the emperor and Jesus. Reading the Gospels along with Josephus’s Wars of the Jews, the parallels are striking. There are dual encounters, addresses to followers, random incidents, “all these little weird parallels,” Atwill says. They all took place in the same locations, often using the same words, but 40 years apart. Thus, Jesus recruits two fishermen on the shore of the Sea of Galilee and says, “I will make you fishers of men.” At the same spot 40 years later, Josephus describes the Romans in a sea battle, catching rebels from a capsized boat with their spears, like fishermen hooking fish.
Atwill says the writers of the Gospels used a literary device called “typology”—“a genre of literature that the ancient Hebrews used”—employing parallels to elicit hidden messages and to suggest the circularity of history and the value of prophecy. But the Romans did it as a joke on the Jews, Atwill says. Introducing themes from Titus’s life into the Gospels, leaving an indelible imprint, like watermarks on paper, was the Romans’ way of leaving their signature, he says.
What motivated them? “They were the vainest people who ever lived,” Atwill says. “They wanted to make sure that posterity knew they had subdued the Jews through a fake religion.
Some of this has been explored by other scholars. Dr. Robert Eisenman, professor of religion at California State University in Long Beach, one of the participants in the movie, says he was long familiar with the practice of “overwriting” texts, “people taking texts and writing over them.” He himself suggested, in his 1997 book, James the Brother of Jesus, that the Gospels had been written over to give them a “pro-Roman slant.”
In uncovering the Titus connection, “Atwill may have carried it a step farther,” Eisenman says.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Thought Provoking! – by fuzzy123
This review is from:
Caesar’s Messiah:The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus (Amazon Instant Video)
Was there a historical “Jesus”?
Athiests will find this documentary fortifying, Christians by and large will go “bull s**t!”
Watching this film, at the first I thought I was watching a conspiracy theory, but later on, I began to see their point.
There are no open minds when it comes to religion; everyone in the debate has already made up their minds before the first words are spoken.
It is easier to question the existence of god than to deconstruct the historical existence of Jesus. One follows the other, but in my mind, the latter takes more intellectual effort, making it harder to penetrate the general consciousness.
But I could be wrong.
The makers of this film make a good case; it’s well worth watching.
The Roman Empire and the Catholic Church are about to Fall: The Roman Conspiracy to Create Jesus Christ Unveiled
Submitted by The South on Thu, 08/02/2012 – 20:38
Get a load of this: http://caesarsmessiahdoc….
It’s going to be released in Beverly Hills, CA. September 28, 2012
The Second Coming of Christ Has Already Happened.
There is absolutely no denial after you grasp this. It may take you a few hours to finally get the gist of it, but once it hits you, it’s a WHAM you’ll never forget, and you’ll never look at the Scriptures the same again.
The “Holy Trinity” …. “Vespasian – Titus – Domitian” …. All three became Emperors of Rome, and after Titus’ death, Domitian constructed the “Arch of Titus”:
Arch of Titus in Rome was constructed in 82 AD by the Roman Emperor Domitian shortly after the death of his older brother Titus to commemorate Titus’ victory in the Sack of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The Arch of Titus has provided the general model for many of the triumphal arches erected since the 16th century including the Arc de Triomphe.
The “Second Coming of Christ” was Titus’ take down of Jerusalem, and the Son of God was memorialized with this mighty Arch. The second attempt was successful, and that was the Second Coming.
As seen here: http://www.touropia.com/a…
The concept of a divine trinity consisting of a father, son and “Holy Ghost” – the Greek words actually mean “awful spirit” – comes from Josephus. Josephus applies the Jews’ messianic prophecies, not just to Vespasian, but to his dynasty. In other words the real trinity is Vespasian, his son Titus, and his son Domitian – the awful spirit.
Domitian was the “Holy Ghost” – The “Awful Spirit” who wanted to be recognized as a God himself.
In Greek evangelion, a technical term meaning “good news of military victory.” In English, it is translated as “gospel.”
The “Gospels” is nothing more than a military victory account of the Romans win of the Jewish. The New Testament was written by the Flavian Dynasty with the help of Josephus Flavius
For anyone who doubts that the Flavian’s of the Roman Dynasty and Josephus were the ones that actually wrote the New Testament and created “Jesus”, just take a moment out of your day and ask yourself why is the Bible so Antisemitic and so “Pro-Roman”? …. “Turn the other cheek” …. “Give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s”, etc.
Now ask yourself if you’ve ever even noticed the book of “Romans” and the book of “Titus” in the NT? Now are you ready for the FACE PALM moment?
Why would a Jewish loving “God” dedicate in his written words, a book to “Romans” and another to “Titus”?
Go read Titus, and realize that it is actually Vespasian (God) giving the Son of God (Titus) instructions on how to teach the newly acquired slaves (Jewish after the Romans conquered them in the War) how to be obedient to their new masters (Vespasian and Titus).
The Original Jewish people had their own God, and he was David; a real Titan; a warrior; a man of war that even brought down Goliath and was soon to take the head off of Caesar (Dead Sea Scrolls), and there were many Jews amongst and within the Roman Empire who were gathering in groups discussing how their God “David” was coming soon to take the head off of Caesar. Nero didn’t like this and called upon Vespasian who he had earlier exiled to return to the Empire and deal with this disobedient Jews, and he did along with his great warrior son Titus.
Vespasian and his son Titus went to Jerusalem and tried to bring down the city, but failed. That was the first coming of Jesus Christ (Titus). Vespasian was wounded and told his son Titus he MUST reenter Jerusalem and finally take her down and make all those unruly Jews submit to the Roman Empire, and Titus went back to Jerusalem and did just that.
Here’s Part 1: and there are 5 parts total:
And that was the “Second Coming of Christ” aka “Titus”.
The following account of Vespasian’s triumph in Rome is provided to us by the Jewish historian, Josephus who was present at the festivities. His description not only provides insight into this victory celebration but also of the nature of other triumphs staged after a Roman victory. We join his story in the early morning hours of the day of the festivities:
The Jews who submitted to their Master (God) and came to him through his Son (Titus) were allowed to enter the “Kingdom of God” aka “Heaven”. Those that disobeyed were killed or not allowed inside the gates of Heaven (the new Jerusalem).
Now hopefully you understand why many Jewish people today do not believe in Jesus Christ; nor do they follow or praise him. Their God is “David” the great warrior and not the pacifistic “Jesus” that turned the other cheek and gave unto Caesar.
Use your head for a moment and realize the Jews and Romans were arch enemies. Do you really think their “God” would be a pacifistic tax slave? Or would he have been a Warrior?
The Romans created this “Jesus” character to hopefully teach the Jews to turn the other cheek; submit to authority; give unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s.
Why would a real living God who’s loving and caring order his followers to kill sinners and their children? Seriously think about this a moment: Would a loving God order the death of a child of a sinner? What did the child have to do with a mother infidelity? The child should not be held accountable for a parents sins, right?
Or did he (Vespasian aka God) order the killing of children so that one day they would not come back to revenge the death of their parents?
Why would a God demand sinners to bring their best Oxen and Cattle as a tribute to God as an offering for their sins? Could it be because there was nothing of more value that the Jews could afford? Why would it be easier for a Camel to fit through the eye of a needle than a rich man get into Heaven? Could it be, because Vespasian did not want anyone of wealth in that Kingdom but himself?
The Scriptures were back dated 40 years to the day that Titus took down Jerusalem. Remember that Jesus spoke of this real Messiah that would burn down the cities; surround Jerusalem and raze the Temple within that 40 year span. The Romans created “Jesus” and made him a passive and forgiving Messiah; one that would turn the other cheek and give unto Caesar that which was Caesars.
The supposed Crucifixion of Jesus Christ was a mockery to the Jews; the end of Christianity; the end of their messiah Jesus, and the acknowledgment of the REAL “Jesus Christ” that fulfilled all those prophesies that the Jews Jesus spoke of, and that REAL “Jesus Christ” was Titus, the Son of God (Vespasian).
They (the Romans-Flavian Caesars) wanted to be known as God (Vespasian) and the Son of God-Jesus Christ (Titus). The only way they could get the Jews to accept them as Gods was to get them to pray through this made up Jesus character they invented. The Jews would NEVER bow to a living man (Vespasian), but by bowing to “Jesus Christ”, they were actually bowing to the Caesars of the Roman Empire. They wore a mask; created a strawman (Jesus). They did not care about the name; they knew that they created “Jesus”, and when the Jews were bowing and praying to Him, that they were actually bowing to Vespasian and Titus.
I know this is a hard pill to swallow for Christians (myself included), but if you actually step away from the Bible and stop looking at it as some magical book, and read it in it’s literal typological form, the truth is in plain sight for all to see.
The campaign of “Jesus” ministry and the campaign of Titus’ war on the Jews are in perfect sequence with each other if you read Josephus’ court of record of the Jewish-Roman War. Remember that Josephus was a Jewish General who was captured by Titus’ Army; they spared him; he was a great mind and they had a use for him in the Empire. One record of events is totally dependent on the other; as in the ministry campaign of Jesus was actually created from Titus’ campaign in his war on Jerusalem.
All “Religions” are total BS; they are meant to divide and conquer; to control the masses; to teach obedience to a master, and that master is Government.
Now you know why all the authors of the Bible never contradict each other; because it was written by a few men at the time; all in the same court.
“Jesus” spoke of his prophecy in 40 years (within his lifetime), not of 2000 years afterwards and beyond. The Flavian’s back dated the Scriptures 40 years on purpose, so that when Titus actually brought down Jerusalem it would look as if HE was the real Christ.
The many “Anti-Christs” that will (already did) come, are actually nothing more than those who opposed Vespasian and Titus; they were non believers; must be possessed with demonic spirits since they did not believe in Jesus Christ (Titus). These disobedient slaves with demonic spirits were against “Anti” Jesus Christ aka Anti-Christs.
No one shall enter the Kingdom of God (Vespasian) without coming through his Son “Jesus Christ” which was actually Titus.
For God (Vespasian) so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son (Titus), that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.
Go read “Titus” at the end of the New Testament; then read Romans and Philemon where “Paul is a prisoner of Christ Jesus”.
At the end of Revelation written by Josephus from the words of God (Vespasian), he warns anyone who alters the text will suffer the plagues described within.
Would a loving God actually do all those things to man just because he changes some text? Or is that the “Threat” of God (Vespasian) to anyone who would alter his words?
Now read Revelation 19:11 “The Rider on the White Horse”
I saw Heaven standing open (the walls of Jerusalem had holes in them from the battle and the gates were finally opened) and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war. His eyes are blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on that no one knows but he himself. He is dressed in a robe “dipped in blood” …
Would a robe dipped in blood actually mean that the robe is Red or Scarlet?
A Roman Victory Parade was at hand; Titus was wearing his Victory Robe and the Victory Crown upon his head as he entered the gates of Heaven (The New Jerusalem).
Here’s the famous painting on Joseph Atwill’s facebook page:
The triumph was a gala affair. Presided over by Vespasian and Titus, it featured piles of booty, including gold relics taken from the destroyed Jewish Temple, paraded through the streets. Now you understand what the text means by “Streets of Gold”.
Titus was the the Rider on the White Horse followed by the armies that followed him were on white horses and dressed in fine linen …. It was a VICTORY PARADE; the “Second Coming of Christ” had taken place; they were all celebrating and dressed for the occasion. It was now time for God (Vespasian) to take his Throne, and the Son of God (Titus) to be seated at his right hand.
“You are worthy to take the scroll and to open it’s seals because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased men for God…”
Titus was wounded in the war.
Once you tie the Scriptures to the Roman-Jewish War, it is plain as day.
Here’s Josephus’ account of the victory celebration first hand:
The most precious of objects taken from Jerusalem were items from the Temple: the golden table on which the bread of the presence had been placed, the golden lampstand, or Menorah, the golden trumpets used in calling people to worship, and a copy of the Jewish Torah. Behind the wagons that carried these objects rode Vespasian, then Titus, with Domitian beside him. The triumphal procession ended at the temple of Jupiter Capitolinus where Simon, son of Gioras, who had been the Jewish general, was put to death before all of the citizens of Rome. All of this happened in 70 A.D. when Titus destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple of God.
If you will read the book in it’s literary and typological sense, you will come to realize it was an account of what had happened THEN, not what would happen 2,000 years from THEN.
Listen to Joseph Atwill explain the truth about the “Jesus” character and how and why he was brought to life:
Here’s another very good interview:
Look up his other interviews on YouTube as well.
Ask yourself one question: Why would a Book inspired by God himself who loved the Jewish people more than anything in the world or universe combined, dedicate a Chapter of His Book to the “Romans” and another to “Titus”?
Answer: Because the Flavian’s created Christianity and with the help of Josephus Flavius, they created the character known as “Jesus Christ”, and Titus himself fulfilled all the prophesies of THEIR creation, and his Father who is now known as God and accepted as God along with Titus who would now be accepted as “Jesus Christ” had fulfilled the prophecy of the “End Times”, which was nothing more than the end of Jerusalem and the Messianic Christian Movement with the “Second Coming of Christ” aka “Titus”.
As a tribute to their conquering victory of the Jews and to make sure everyone living at that time knew that Vespasian was to now be recognized as God and Titus as the Son of God aka Jesus Christ, they put it in plain sight for all to see in the book of Romans and the book of Titus.
In the book of Titus, Vespasian (God) is talking to his Son Titus (Jesus Christ) and instructing him on how to teach the new slaves (Jews) to be subservient and obedient to their new God.
Just read it; it’s right there in the “Holy Bible” for all to see who the REAL God and the REAL Jesus Christ really is.
This is a good overview on Joe’s Blog:
Once we break the chains of religion, the political structure of the world WILL change.
The Second Coming of Jesus Christ has already taken place; and the “End Times” are nothing more than the end of the militaristic-messianic movement of the Jews in about 70 CE (Common Era).